CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA (CVILLE RIGHT NOW) – Following the June term of the Supreme Court of the United States, the most notable decision addressed the question of presidential immunity. In a historic 6-3 decision, the court ruled that U.S. presidents have immunity for “official acts” performed in office. Chief Justice Roberts outlined additional conditions in the majority opinion, while Justice Sotomayor authored the dissenting opinion. WINA Chief Legal Analyst Tim Heaphy, a former Federal Prosecutor and lead investigative attorney of the January 6th commission, spoke with WINA News Director Jay Hart to provide analysis on the decision and its potential impact on the current federal case involving the former president. Listen to their discussion below.